English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Modelling and simulation in mechanobiology play an increasingly important role to unravel the complex mechanisms that allow resident cells to sense and respond to mechanical cues. Many of the in vivo mechanical loads occur on the tissue length scale, thus raising the essential question how the resulting macroscopic strains and stresses are transferred across the scales down to the cellular and subcellular levels. Since cells anchor to the collagen fibres within the extracellular matrix, the reliable representation of fibre deformation is a prerequisite for models that aim at linking tissue biomechanics and cell mechanobiology. In this paper, we consider the two-scale mechanical response of an affine structural model as an example of a continuum mechanical approach and compare it with the results of a discrete fibre network model. In particular, we shed light on the crucially different mechanical properties of the ‘fibres’ in these two approaches. While assessing the capability of the affine structural approach to capture the fibre kinematics in real tissues is beyond the scope of our study, our results clearly show that neither the macroscopic tissue response nor the microscopic fibre orientation statistics can clarify the question of affinity.

Risky interpretations across the length scales: continuum vs. discrete models for soft tissue mechanobiology