English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Methane hydroxylation by metal-oxo oxidants is one of the Holy Grails in biomimetic and biotechnological chemistry. The only enzymes known to perform this reaction in Nature are iron-containing soluble methane monooxygenase and copper-containing particulate methane monooxygenase. Furthermore, few biomimetic iron-containing oxidants have been designed that can hydroxylate methane efficiently. Recent studies reported that μ-nitrido-bridged diiron(IV)-oxo porphyrin and phthalocyanine complexes hydroxylate methane to methanol efficiently. To find out whether the reaction rates are enhanced by replacing iron by ruthenium, we performed a detailed computational study. Our work shows that the μ-nitrido-bridged diruthenium(IV)-oxo reacts with methane via hydrogen atom abstraction barriers that are considerably lower in energy (by about 5 kcal mol ‒1 ) as compared to the analogous diiron(IV)-oxo complex. An analysis of the electronic structure implicates similar spin and charge distributions for the diiron(IV)-oxo and diruthenium(IV)-oxo complexes, but the strength of the O‒H bond formed during the reaction is much stronger for the latter. As such a larger hydrogen atom abstraction driving force for the Ru complex than for the Fe complex is found, which should result in higher reactivity in the oxidation of methane.

Properties and reactivity of μ-nitrido-bridged dimetal porphyrinoid complexes: how does ruthenium compare to iron?