English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Atmospheric transient eddy dynamical forcing (TEDF)-driven midlatitude unstable air–sea interaction has recently been recognized as a crucial positive feedback for the maintenance of the extratropical decadal variabilities. Our recent theoretical work (Chen et al., Clim Dyn  10.1007/s00382-020-05405-0 , 2020) has characterized such an interaction through building an analytical midlatitude barotropic atmospheric model coupled to a simplified upper oceanic model. This study extends the analytical model to including a two-layer quasi-geostrophic baroclinic atmospheric model and then identifies the roles of vertical distributions of atmospheric TEDF and diabatic heating in midlatitude unstable air–sea interaction. It is found that midlatitude air–sea coupling with more realistic vertical profiles of atmospheric TEDF and diabatic heating destabilizes oceanic Rossby wave modes over the entire range of zonal wavelengths, in which the most unstable coupled mode features an equivalent barotropic atmospheric low (high) pressure over a cold (warm) oceanic surface. Spatial structure and period of the most unstable mode are more consistent with the observation than those from in previous model. Although either TEDF or diabatic heating alone can lead to a destabilized coupled mode, the former makes a dominant contribution to the instability. The increase of low-layer TEDF stimulates the instability more effectively if the TEDF in upper layer is larger than in lower layer, while the TEDF in either high or low layers can individually cause the instability. The surface heating always destabilizes the air–sea interaction, while the mid-level heating always decays the coupled mode. The results of this study further confirm the TEDF-driven positive feedback mechanism in midlatitude air–sea interaction proposed by recent observational and numerical experiment studies.

Roles of vertical distributions of atmospheric transient eddy dynamical forcing and diabatic heating in midlatitude unstable air–sea interaction