English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Two-dimensional laser-induced incandescence (LII) measurements usually involve the use of a cylindrical lens to illuminate the planar region of interest. This creates a varying laser fluence and sheet width in the imaged flame region which could lead to large uncertainties in the quantification of the 2D LII signals into soot volume fraction distributions. To investigate these effects, 2D LII measurements using a wide range of laser pulse energies were performed on a premixed flat ethylene–air flame while employing a cylindrical lens to focus the laser sheet. Using shorter focal length of the focusing lens resulted in larger variation of the LII signal profiles across the flame. A heat – and – mass – transfer - based LII model was also used to simulate the measurements and good agreement was found. The ratio between focal length (FL) and image length (IL) was introduced as a useful parameter for estimating the bias in estimated soot volume fractions across the flame. The general recommendation is to maximize this FL/IL ratio in an experiment, which in practice means the use of a long focal length lens. Furthermore, the best choices of laser fluence and detection gate width are discussed based on results from these simulations.

Two-dimensional laser-induced incandescence for soot volume fraction measurements: issues in quantification due to laser beam focusing