English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Single walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) are luminescent. Up to now, twopreparation methods, both of which isolate individual SWNTs, have enabled thedetection of nanotube bandgap photoluminescence (PL): encapsulation ofindividual SWNTs into surfactant micelles, and direct growth of individualSWNTs suspended in air between pillars. This paper compares the PL obtainedfrom suspended SWNTs to published PL data obtained from encapsulated SWNTs. Wefind that emission peaks are blue-shifted by 28 meV on average for thesuspended nanotubes as compared to the encapsulated nanotubes. Similarly, theresonant absorption peaks are blue-shifted on average by 16 meV. Both shiftsdepend weakly on the particular chirality and diameter of the SWNT.Comment: 16 pages, 3 figure

Photoluminescence from single-walled carbon nanotubes: a comparison between suspended and micelle-encapsulated nanotubes