English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Thirty-four patients with three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures from two different trauma centres were studied retrospectively. Sixteen were treated without osteosynthesis and compared with 18 patients treated with tension-band fixation. Fracture classification and clinical examination were made by the same persons in both groups. Most of the three-part fractures healed with good pain relief and good function in daily life but often with a loss of motion. Four-part fractures often led to pain, loss of motion and of function. Conservative treatment seemed superior to tension-band fixation for three-part fractures. Four-part fractures healed with better function and range of motion after tension-band fixation.

Non-operative treatment versus tension-band osteosynthesis in three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures