English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A comparison was made between 44 humeral fractures treated conservatively with functional bracing (Group 1) and 45 treated by operation with a locking nail (Group 2). Thirty-eight of the 44 patients in Group 1 (86%) and 22 of the 45 patients in Group 2 (47%) regained full movement of the shoulder joint. The functional end results were somewhat better in Group 1 although over 90% of patients in both groups were able to clasp their fingers behind their necks and to reach up their backs without restriction. Two patients developed a pseudarthrosis in Group 1, and 2 patients in Group 2 required operative revision due to a haematoma in 1 case and as a result of an infection in the other. There were 6 cases of primary radial nerve damage in both groups, and 6 had to be decompressed operatively. Residual sensory and motor disturbance remained in 2 patients in Group 1. Both methods are useful for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. We advocate functional bracing as the method of choice if no contraindications exist.

Comparative results of bracing and interlocking nailing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures