English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

1 Summary A second-order approximation of the tesseroid method has been presented in the paper “A comparison of the tesseroid, prism and point-mass approaches for mass reductions in gravity field modelling” (Heck and Seitz 2007) for the gravitational potential and its first radial derivative. In the paper “Optimizedformulasforthegravitationalfieldofatesseroid” (Grombein et al. 2013) this analytical approach was optimized and extended to all first- and second-order derivatives of the potential. In both papers the general expression of the Taylor series expansion contains a formal error and needs to be corrected. As will be shown, this correction or rather erratum has no impact on the published and widely used second-order tesseroid formulas.

journal of geodesy

Corrections to “A comparison of the tesseroid, prism and point-mass approaches for mass reductions in gravity field modelling” (Heck and Seitz, 2007) and “Optimized formulas for the gravitational field of a tesseroid” (Grombein et al., 2013)