English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Two ways of assigning meaning to a language with uniform concurrency are presented and compared. The language has uninterpreted elementary actions from which statements are composed using sequential composition, nondeterministic choice, parallel composition with communication, and recursion. The first semantics uses infinite streams in the sense which is a refinement of the linear time semantics of De Bakker et al. The second semantics uses the finite observations of Hoare et al., situated “in between” the divergence and readiness semantics of Olderog & Hoare. It is shown that the two models are isomorphic and that this isomorphism induces an equivalence result between the two semantics.

Infinite streams and finite observations in the semantics of uniform concurrency