English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Our study sought to determine whether premedication with intramuscular midazolam would decrease the time to induction of anaesthesia with intravenous midazolam, and if so whether induction of anaesthesia would be as rapid as with thiopentone or ketamine, intravenously. Eight-nine patients, ASA physical status I or II, received midazolam 0.2 mg X kg-1, thiopentone 3.0 mg X kg-1, or ketamine 2.0 mg X kg-1 intravenously 60-90 min after intramuscular injection of either midazolam 0.07 mg X kg-1 or matching placebo. Time to induction of anaesthesia or the dose required to induce anaesthesia with intravenous midazolam was not decreased by midazolam premedication. Both with or without premedication, midazolam induction time was longer than with thiopentone or ketamine. Midazolam induction was associated with a lower incidence of blood pressure increase than with ketamine induction, and a lower incidence of apnea than that with either thiopentone or ketamine.

Premedication with intramuscular midazolam: Effect on induction time with intravenous midazolam compared to intravenous thiopentone or ketamine