English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Conclusions  Developing countries including the NIEs failed to maintain their shares in total foreign investment of all major OECD countries in the eighties. Shares were generally lower by 1988 than ten years ago. This negative trend can be observed for investment in manufacturing in particular, but also for non-manufacturing. Middle East and SubSaharan African countries came down to negligible shares, while shifts in shares mainly occurred between Latin America as a losing region and the Asian NIEs as winners. In absolute terms, however, Latin America remained a major host area. Within the regions, trends towards concentrating investment on few countries proliferated from Latin America where such concentration was traditionally high, to Asia with Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, and partly Hong Kong, in the lead. Against this background, home countries widely continued to maintain their traditionally preferred strongholds as did Japan in Southeast Asia, West Germany in Brazil and Argentina, the US in Latin America in general, and the UK in Commonwealth countries. Such patterns remained stable over time, but differed from each other.

Competition among developing countries for foreign investment in the eighties — Whom did OECD investors prefer?