English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Summary  By means of a phenomenological approach, we demonstrate that the mixed splay-bend elastic constantK 13 in the free energy density of nematic liquid crystals must be considered zero, unless the bulk contributions of the squares of the distortion second-order derivatives are taken into account, together with the squares of the first-order derivatives times the second-order derivatives, and with the fourth powers of the first-order derivatives. Such contributions just reduce to one in the presence of—and close to—a threshold. Furthermore, the saddle-splayK 24-term instead is shown always to play an essential role, as the bulk first-order elasticity, in determining the distortion free energy of nematics with weak anchoring subjected to spatial deformations. Finally, the new surfacelike elastic constants are shown to have a nilpotent character: thus they behave as well asK 24 from the point of view of the variational calculus.

The structure of the distortion free-energy density in nematics: Second-order elasticity and surface terms