English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

I describe a new likelihood technique, based on counts-in-cells statistics,that I use to analyze repeating in the BATSE 1B and 2B catalogues. Using the 1Bdata, I find that repeating is preferred over non-repeating by 4.3:1 odds, witha well-defined peak at 5-6 repetitions per source. I find that the post-1B dataare consistent with the repeating model inferred from the 1B data, after takinginto account the lower fraction of bursts with well-determined positions.Combining the two data sets, I find that the odds favoring repeating overnon-repeating are almost unaffected at 4:1, with a narrower peak at 5repetitions per source. I conclude that the data sets are consistent both witheach other and with repeating, and that for these data sets the odds favorrepeating.Comment: 5 pages including 3 encapsulated figures, as a uuencoded, gzipped,  Postscript file. To appear in Proc. of the 1995 La Jolla workshop ``High  Velocity Neutron Stars and Gamma-Ray Bursts'' eds. Rothschild, R. et al.,  AIP, New Yor

Likelihood analysis of repeating in the BATSE catalogue