English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The process of the interpretation of the constitution has been shown to be politically neutral in the sense that there is no inherent political bias with respect to differing political viewpoints. The process, on the other hand, stabilizes whatever diverse impulses it receives. There is no evidence of a (second) supposition of reconciliation of political viewpoints (according to the supposition of reconciliation of legal interpretations) underlying the process, so unbalanced impulses (issued from whatever political direction) will be worked out. The imbalance will be stabilized as a new balance; imbalances are stabilized as such, not attenuated nor counterbalanced by the process itself. Any counterbalance must come as the consequence of a new external impulse.

Constitutional guarantees and the distribution of power and wealth