English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In electroencephalography (EEG) source imaging, the inverse source estimates are depth biased in such a way that their maxima are often close to the sensors. This depth bias can be quantified by inspecting the statistics (mean and covariance) of these estimates. In this paper, we find weighting factors within a Bayesian framework for the used \(\ell _1/\ell _2\) sparsity prior that the resulting maximum a posterior (MAP) estimates do not favour any particular source location. Due to the lack of an analytical expression for the MAP estimate when this sparsity prior is used, we solve the weights indirectly. First, we calculate the Gaussian prior variances that lead to depth un-biased maximum a posterior (MAP) estimates. Subsequently, we approximate the corresponding weight factors in the sparsity prior based on the solved Gaussian prior variances. Finally, we reconstruct focal source configurations using the sparsity prior with the proposed weights and two other commonly used choices of weights that can be found in literature.

Prior Variances and Depth Un-Biased Estimators in EEG Focal Source Imaging