English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Koiran showed that if a $n$-variate polynomial of degree $d$ (with $d=n^{O(1)}$) is computed by a circuit of size $s$, then it is also computed by a homogeneous circuit of depth four and of size $2^{O(\sqrt{d}\log(d)\log(s))}$. Using this result, Gupta, Kamath, Kayal and Saptharishi gave a $\exp(O(\sqrt{d\log(d)\log(n)\log(s)}))$ upper bound for the size of the smallest depth three circuit computing a $n$-variate polynomial of degree $d=n^{O(1)}$ given by a circuit of size $s$.   We improve here Koiran's bound. Indeed, we show that if we reduce an arithmetic circuit to depth four, then the size becomes $\exp(O(\sqrt{d\log(ds)\log(n)}))$. Mimicking Gupta, Kamath, Kayal and Saptharishi's proof, it also implies the same upper bound for depth three circuits.   This new bound is not far from optimal in the sense that Gupta, Kamath, Kayal and Saptharishi also showed a $2^{\Omega(\sqrt{d})}$ lower bound for the size of homogeneous depth four circuits such that gates at the bottom have fan-in at most $\sqrt{d}$. Finally, we show that this last lower bound also holds if the fan-in is at least $\sqrt{d}$.

Improved Bounds for Reduction to Depth 4 and Depth 3