English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

International audienceThe notion of differential privacy has emerged in the area of statistical databases as a measure of protection of the participants' sensitive information, which can be compromised by selected queries. Differential privacy is usually achieved by using mechanisms that add random noise to the query answer. Thus, privacy is obtained at the cost of reducing the accuracy, and therefore the "utility", of the answer. Since the utility depends on the user's side information, commonly modelled as a prior distribution, a natural goal is to design mechanisms that are optimal for every prior. However, it has been shown that such mechanisms do not exist for any query other than counting queries. Given the above negative result, in this paper we consider the problem of identifying a restricted class of priors for which an optimal mechanism does exist. Given an arbitrary query and a privacy parameter, we geometrically characterise a special region of priors as a convex polytope in the priors space. We then derive upper bounds for utility as well as for min-entropy leakage for the priors in this region. Finally we define what we call the "tight-constraints mechanism" and we discuss the conditions for its existence. This mechanism has the property of reaching the bounds for all the priors of the region, and thus it is optimal on the whole region

A Differentially Private Mechanism of Optimal Utility for a Region of Priors