English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

ion is essential in the formal specification of programs. A common way of writing abstract specifications is to specify implementations in terms of basic mathematical structures. Specification languages like JML offer so-called model classes that provide interfaces to such structures. One way to reason about specifications that make use of model classes is to map model classes directly to structures provided by the theorem prover used for verification. Crucial to the soundness of this technique is the existence of a semantic correspondence between the model class and the related structure. In this paper, we present a formal framework based on theory interpretation for proving this correspondence. The framework provides a systematic way of determining the necessary proof obligations and justifies the soundness of the approach.

Proving Consistency and Completeness of Model Classes Using Theory Interpretation