English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In ensemble methods to create multiple classifiers mostly bootstrap sampling method is preferred. The use of subsampling in ensemble creation, produce diverse members for the ensemble and induce instability for stable classifiers. In subsampling the only parameter is the subsample rate that is how much observations we will take from the training sample in each subsample. In this paper we have presented our work on the effect of different subsampling rate (SSR) in bagging type ensemble of stable classifiers, Subbagging and Double Subbagging. We have used three stable classifiers, Linear Support Vector Machine (LSVM), Stable Linear Discriminant Analysis (SLDA) and Logistic Linear Classifier (LOGLC). We also experimented on decision tree to check whether the performance of tree classifier is influenced by different SSR. From the experiment we see that for most of the datasets, the subbagging with stable classifiers in low SSR produces better performance than bagging and single stable classifiers, also in some cases better than double subbagging. We also found an opposite relation between the performance of double subbagging and subbagging.

Effect of Subsampling Rate on Subbagging and Related Ensembles of Stable Classifiers