English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In self-training methods, unlabeled samples are first assigned a provisional label by the classifier, and then used to extend the training set of the classifier itself. For this latter step it is important to choose only the samples whose classification is likely to be correct, according to a suitably defined reliability measure. In this paper we want to study to what extent the choice of a particular technique for evaluating the classification reliability can affect the learning performance. To this aim, we have compared five different reliability evaluators on four publicly available datasets, analyzing and discussing the obtained results.

The Impact of Reliability Evaluation on a Semi-supervised Learning Approach