English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper argues that it is important to study issues concerning trust and reliance when developing systems that are intended to augment cognition. Operators often under-rely on the help of a support system that provides advice or that performs certain cognitive tasks autonomously. The decision to rely on support seems to be largely determined by the notion of relative trust. However, this decision to rely on support is not always appropriate, especially when support systems are not perfectly reliable. Because the operator's reliability estimations are typically imperfectly aligned or calibrated with the support system's true capabilities, we propose that the aid makes an estimation of the extent of this calibration (under different circumstances) and intervenes accordingly. This system is intended to improve overall performance of the operator-support system as a whole. The possibilities in terms of application of these ideas are explored and an implementation of this concept in an abstract task environment has been used as a case study.

Closed-Loop Adaptive Decision Support Based on Automated Trust Assessment