English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Heavy focus on jus in bello issues such as when and whom one may kill in war tends to conflate the ethics of war with the law on war, thereby reifying peace as a (legal) state of affairs. That works well enough in jus in bello thought, but most jus ad bellum criteria require a notion of peace that is political, relational, and developmental. Two of those criteria, just cause and right intention, have significant implications for an appropriate notion of peace. As relational, peace is an extrinsic good. As developmental, it is good both as an end and as a means or practice.

Just War Thought and the Notion of Peace