English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Restrictive policies that limit antimicrobial consumption, including therapeutically  justified use, might be necessary to tackle the problem of antimicrobial  resistance. We argue that such policies would be ethically justified when forgoing  antimicrobials constitutes a form of easy rescue for an individual. These are cases  of mild and self-limiting infections in otherwise healthy patients whose overall  health is not significantly compromised by the infection. In such cases, restrictive  policies would be ethically justified because they would coerce individuals into fulfilling  a moral obligation they independently have. However, to ensure that such  justification is the strongest possible, states also have the responsibility to ensure  that forgoing antimicrobials is as easy as possible for patients by implementing  adequate compensation measures.

Moral Responsibility and the Justification of Policies to Preserve Antimicrobial Effectiveness