English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Asynchronous communication mechanisms are usually a basic ingredient of distributed systems and protocols. For these systems, asynchronous may-based testing seems to be exactly what is needed to capture safety and certain security properties. We study may testing equivalence focusing on the asynchronous versions of CCS and π-calculus. We start from an operational testing preorder and provide finitary and fully abstract trace-based interpretations for it, together with complete inequational axiomatizations. The results throw light on the differences between synchronous and asynchronous systems and on the weaker testing power of asynchronous observations

A Theory of “May” Testing for Asynchronous Languages