A Comparison of PCA and GA Selected Features for Cloud Field Classification
Author(s) -
Miguel Macías Macías,
Carlos J. Garcı́a-Orellana,
Horacio M. González–Velasco,
Ramón GallardoCaballero,
A. Serrano
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
lecture notes in computer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Book series
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.249
H-Index - 400
eISSN - 1611-3349
pISSN - 0302-9743
ISBN - 3-540-00131-X
DOI - 10.1007/3-540-36131-6_5
Subject(s) - principal component analysis , computer science , pattern recognition (psychology) , artificial neural network , artificial intelligence , segmentation , feature selection , curse of dimensionality , dimensionality reduction , image segmentation , set (abstract data type) , programming language
In this work a back propagation neural network (BPNN) is used for the segmentation of Meteosat images covering the Iberian Peninsula. The images are segmented in the classes land (L), sea (S), fog (F), low clouds (CL), middle clouds (CM), high clouds (CH) and clouds with vertical growth (CV). The classification is performed from an initial set of several statistical textural features based on the gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) proposed by Welch [1]. This initial set of features is made up of 144 parameters and to reduce its dimensionality two methods for feature selection have been studied and compared. The first one includes genetic algorithms (GA) and the second is based on principal component analysis (PCA). These methods are conceptually very different. While GA interacts with the neural network in the selection process, PCA only depends on the values of the initial set of features.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom