English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

International audienceGiven a set of leaf-labeled trees with identical leaf sets, the well-known MAXIMUM AGREEMENT SUBTREE (MAST) consists of finding a subtree homeomorphically included in all input trees and with the largest number of leaves. Its variant called MAXIMUM COMPATIBLE TREE (MCT) is less stringent, as it allows the input trees to be refined. Both problems are of particular interest in computational biology, where trees encountered have often small degrees. In this paper, we study the parameterized complexity of MAST and MCT with respect to the maximum degree, denoted D, of the input trees. While MAST is polynomial for bounded D, we show that MAST is W[1]-hard with respect to parameter D. Moreover, relying on recent advances in parameterized complexity we obtain a tight lower bound: while MAST can be solved in O(N^{O(D)}) time where N denotes the input length, we show that an O(N^{o(D)}) bound is not achievable, unlesss SNP is included in SE. We also show that MCT is W[1]-hard with respect to D, and that MCT cannot be solved in O(n^{o(2^{D/2})}) time, unless SNP is included in SE

Solving the Maximum Agreement SubTree and the Maximum Compatible Tree Problems on Many Bounded Degree Trees