English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In [Schaad and Moffett, 2002] we have presented our initial investigations into the delegation of obligations and the concept of review as one kind of organisational principle to control such delegation activities. This initial work led us to a more detailed and refined analysis of organisational controls [Schaad, 2003], [Schaad and Moffett, 2004] with a particular emphasis on the notion of general and specific obligations [Schaad, 2004]. In particular, this distinction allowed us to formally capture how a principal may be related to an obligation; how obligations relate to roles; and how the delegation of specific and general obligations may be controlled through the concepts of review and supervision. This paper complements the delegation of obligation and authorisation policy objects by discussing their revocation, based on the revocation schemes suggested in [Hagstrom et al., 2001]. In particular, we will investigate how delegated general and specific obligations can be revoked and what effect the presence of roles has on the revocation process. We use the Alloy language and its automated analysis facilities [Jackson, 2001] to formally support our discussion.

Revocation of Obligation and Authorisation Policy Objects