English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Bug finding tools can find defects in software source code us- ing anautomated static analysis. This automation may be able to reduce the time spentfor other testing and review activities. For this we need to have a clearunderstanding of how the defects found by bug finding tools relate to thedefects found by other techniques. This paper describes a case study usingseveral projects mainly from an industrial environment that were used toanalyse the interrelationships. The main finding is that the bug finding toolspredominantly find different defects than testing but a subset of defects foundby reviews. However, the types that can be detected are analysed morethoroughly. Therefore, a combination is most advisable if the high number offalse positives of the tools can be tolerated.

Comparing Bug Finding Tools with Reviews and Tests