English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Erosion through skin of connecting tubing of an inflatable penile prosthesis ( IPP ) has not been previously reported.    Aim  The aim of this study was to present a case of tubing erosion, review the pertinent literature, and discuss the possible causes and management options, including preservation of the device and its components.    Methods  A 42‐year‐old male failing to respond to medical treatment for erectile dysfunction underwent insertion of an  AMS  700  IPP  in 1986. Six years later, a revision was necessary because of a leak in the right cylinder and 4 years after, the pump was replaced. Fourteen years after the original implant, he presented with a portion of the tube connecting the pump to the right cylinder eroding through the skin. There was no infection. The skin area involved was resected and the original pump and tubing were buried in a new scrotal pocket after thorough irrigation.    Results  The  IPP  remained in place, allowing vaginal penetration and without infection for another 11 years. Three years later, it was de‐functionalized, converted into a fixed volume device. It eventually was replaced 25 years after originally implanted with a semirigid prosthesis because it did not provide sufficient rigidity and because of concerns about the presence of “screws” detected during pelvic imaging.    Conclusions  Mechanical failures in the early  IPP  models, as illustrated in this case, were expected. However, the long survival of the device is remarkable. Erosion of the connecting tubing through the skin is unique and, under exceptional circumstances, may be managed conservatively without replacing components of the  IPP . Clinicians unfamiliar with procedures involving inflatable devices need to be aware of “foreign bodies” visible in radiological examinations in men who have had revisions of an  IPP .  Morales A. Tubing erosion of an inflatable penile prosthesis long after implantation. Sex Med 2014;2:103–106.

Tubing Erosion of an Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Long after Implantation