English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Gas‐liquid flows through packed bed reactors (PBRs) are challenging to predict due to the tortuous flow paths that fluid interfaces must traverse. Experiments at the International Space Station showed that bubble and pulse flows are predominately observed under microgravity conditions, while the trickle and spray flows observed under terrestrial conditions are not present in microgravity. To understand the physics behind the former experiments, we simulate bubble flow through a PBR for different packing‐particle‐diameter‐based Weber numbers and under different gravity conditions. We demonstrate different pore‐scale mechanisms, such as capillary entrapment, buoyancy entrapment, and inertia‐induced bubble displacement. Then, we perform a quantitative analysis by introducing new dynamic scales, dependent upon the evolving gas‐liquid interfacial area, to understand the dynamic trade‐offs between the inertia, capillary, and buoyancy forces on a bubble passing through a PBR. This analysis leads us to define new dimensionless Weber‐like numbers that delineate bubble entrapment from bubble displacement.

Hydrodynamics of bubble flow through a porous medium with applications to packed bed reactors