English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

none of the authors come to grips. No one in the book attempts references conclude all chapters. The subject index contains the usual, difficult to detect lacunae, both at the page and entry to define culture, differentiate culture and society, or indicate that culture is a complex concept that should be uttered with levels. For example, a major insight about the future of cyberspace on page 29 is not one of the four pages listed after the some caution and humility. Raymond Williams and other students of these two keywords before keywords were cool must entry for cyberspace in the subject index. The absence of an entry for a chapter subheading on ‘‘Loss of Novelty’’ (I checked be rolling and writhing. Evidently all revolutions, including the computer sort, result in some forgetfulness. It must be a coping under both L and N) is an example of entry-level lacunae. Unevenness of indexing is another problem. ‘‘Proprietary mechanism or survival strategy. fame’’ is indexed, but not its complement, ‘‘performance fame’’. Another key concept, ‘‘patron swapping,’’ is not indexed. Its meaning is not naughty, so it does not pose a threat Thomas A. Peters to decency, regardless of what the acknowledged legislators of University Libraries the real world may assert. Northern Illinois University The book contains the expected frequency of interesting tyDeKalb, IL 60115-2868 pographical, spelling, and grammatical phenomena. For examE-mail: tpeters@niu.edu ple, page 30 contains a potential neologism (‘‘febright’’) of uncertain, febrile meaning. I checked both the OED and HotBot in search of enlightenment. In an impromptu, unscientific analyReferences sis of the phenomenon of self-citation, I noted that, of the fifteen authors in the cited authors index with page references spilling Porter, D. (Ed.) . (1997). Internet culture. New York: Routledge. over into two or more lines, nine of them also were authors of Williams, R. (1958). Culture and society 1780–1950. London: pieces in this volume. Group self-citation is an interesting social Chatto & Windus. phenomenon, boldly moving into cyberspace, but not very conWilliams, R. (1976).

Gateways to Knowledge: The Role of Academic Librariesin Teaching, Learning, and Research, edited by Lawrence Dowler