English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

From its inception, a large part of the motivation for Cognitive Science hasbeen the need for an interdisciplinary journal for the study of minds andintelligent systems. One threat to the interdisciplinarity of CognitiveScience, both the field and journal, is that it may become, or already be, toodominated by psychologists. In 2005, psychology was a keyword for 51% ofsubmissions, followed distantly by linguistics (17%), artificial intelligence(13%), neuroscience (10%), computer science (9%), and philosophy (8%). TheInstitute for Scientific Information (ISI) gathers data not only on howindividual articles cite one another, but also on macroscopic citation patternsamong journals. Journals or sets of journals can be considered as proxies forfields. As fields become established, they often create journals. By studyingthe patterns of citations among journals that cite and are cited by CognitiveScience, we can better: 1) appreciate the scholarly ecology surrounding thejournal and the journals role within this ecology, 2) establish competitor andalternate journals, and 3) determine the natural clustering of fields relatedto cognitive science.

The Import and Export of Cognitive Science