English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The journal structure in the China Scientific and Technical Papers andCitations Database (CSTPCD) is analysed from three perspectives: the databaselevel, the specialty level and the institutional level (i.e., universityjournals versus journals issued by the Chinese Academy of Sciences). Theresults are compared with those for (Chinese) journals included in the ScienceCitation Index. The frequency of journal-journal citation relations in theCSTPCD is an order of magnitude lower than in the SCI. Chinese journals,especially high-quality journals, prefer to cite international journals ratherthan domestic ones. However, Chinese journals do not get an equivalentreception from their international counterparts. The international visibilityof Chinese journals is low, but varies among fields of science. Journals of theChinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) have a better reception in the internationalscientific community than university journals.

A Comparison between the China Scientific and Technical Papers and  Citations Database and the Science Citation Index in terms of journal  hierarchies and inter-journal citation relations