English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Using the Scopus dataset (1996-2007) a grand matrix of aggregatedjournal-journal citations was constructed. This matrix can be compared in termsof the network structures with the matrix contained in the Journal CitationReports (JCR) of the Institute of Scientific Information (ISI). Since theScopus database contains a larger number of journals and covers also thehumanities, one would expect richer maps. However, the matrix is in this casesparser than in the case of the ISI data. This is due to (i) the larger numberof journals covered by Scopus and (ii) the historical record of citations olderthan ten years contained in the ISI database. When the data is highlystructured, as in the case of large journals, the maps are comparable, althoughone may have to vary a threshold (because of the differences in densities). Inthe case of interdisciplinary journals and journals in the social sciences andhumanities, the new database does not add a lot to what is possible with theISI databases.

Journal Maps on the Basis of Scopus Data: A comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI