English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Research output and impact is currently the focus of serious debateworldwide. Quantitative analyses based on a wide spectrum of indices indicate aclear advantage of US institutions as compared to institutions in Europe andthe rest of the world. However the measures used to quantify researchperformance are mostly static: Even though research output is the result of aprocess that extends in time as well as in space, indices often only take intoaccount the current affiliation when assigning influential research toinstitutions. In this paper, we focus on the field of mathematics andinvestigate whether the image that emerges from static indices persists whenbringing in more dynamic information, through the study of the "trajectories"of highly cited mathematicians: birthplace, country of first degree, country ofPhD and current affiliation. While the dominance of the US remains apparent,some interesting patterns -that perhaps explain this dominance- emerge.

Influential Mathematicians: Birth, Education and Affiliation