English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Although whether P equals NP is an important, open problem in computerscience, and although Jaeger's 2008 paper, "Solving the P/NP Problem UnderIntrinsic Uncertainty" (arXiv:0811.0463) presents an attempt at tackling theproblem by discussing the possibility that all computation is uncertain to somedegree, there are a number of logical oversights present in that paper whichpreclude it from serious consideration toward having resolved P-versus-NP.There are several differences between the model of computation presented inJaeger's paper and the standard model, as well as several bold assumptions thatare not well supported in Jaeger's paper or in the literature. In addition, wefind several omissions of rigorous proof that ultimately weaken this paper to apoint where it cannot be considered a candidate solution to the P-versus-NPproblem.

A Critique of "Solving the P/NP Problem Under Intrinsic Uncertainty", arXiv:0811.0463