English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This chapter defines a new concept and framework for constructing fusionrules for evidences. This framework is based on a referee function, which doesa decisional arbitrament conditionally to basic decisions provided by theseveral sources of information. A simple sampling method is derived from thisframework. The purpose of this sampling approach is to avoid the combinatoricswhich are inherent to the definition of fusion rules of evidences. Thisdefinition of the fusion rule by the means of a sampling process makes possiblethe construction of several rules on the basis of an algorithmic implementationof the referee function, instead of a mathematical formulation. Incidentally,it is a versatile and intuitive way for defining rules. The framework isimplemented for various well known evidence rules. On the basis of thisframework, new rules for combining evidences are proposed, which takes intoaccount a consensual evaluation of the sources of information.

Definition of evidence fusion rules on the basis of Referee Functions