English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

I show--contrary to common beliefs tolerated by the 'bosses'--that anyinterpretation of ZF that admits Aristotle's particularisation is not sound;that the standard interpretation of PA is not sound; that PA is consistent butomega-inconsistent; that a sound finitary interpretation of PA is definable interms of Turing-computability; and that PA cannot be consistently extended toZF.

The significance of Nathanson's 'boss' factor in legitimising  Aristotle's particularisation: Why we need to revise current interpretations  of Cantor's, Goedel's, Turing's and Tarski's formal reasoning