English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Participating a scientific workshop is nowadays often an adventure becausethe number of participants do seldom exceed the number of talks. A half-dayworkshop is mostly finished at lunchtime, speakers are sometimes not presentand unexcused, and a strict progression of the workshop offers little air fordiscussion. And when talks are re-scheduled on short notice in case that aspeech is dropped out, attaining guests definitely wonder why the presenter istalking about something that does not match the previously announced talk. Inthis respect, we believe that the organization of a workshop in the classicalsense must be reconsidered. It is not enough of compelling the presenters topay the registration fee only and to let the participants being impassive ortaken away mentally. With this work, we address several propositions to becomeimplemented in the future workshop organization. With that, we hope tocontribute to the identification of scientific workshops as a place ofinteraction.

16 Propositions to Reconsider the Organization of a Scientific Workshop