English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In 2000 Nicholas J. Mackintosh (2000) published an article in "Nature"referring to the concept of general intelligence ("g") claiming that there isclear empirical evidence for the existence of the g factor and psychologistsare "united in their support of g". Surprisingly, his view remained yetunchallenged although this issue is by no means as clear-cut as Mackintoshargues. Let us therefore attempt to clarify some common but unfortunately majormisconceptions about g, which Mackintosh, following Jensen's (1998) precedent,recounted in his "Nature" article. The bottom line is that Spearman's g doesnot exist, that this has been known and acknowledged by leading scholars(Guttman, 1992; Thurstone, 1947) of factor analysis for decades so that thetask of objectively defining human intelligence remains unfinished.

A Rejoinder to Mackintosh and some Remarks on the Concept of General Intelligence