English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The seismic potential of any regional seismogenic area is analyzed in termsof the "open physical system" inflow - outflow energy balance model(Thanassoulas, 2008, Part - I). Following the magnitude determination methodpresented by Thanassoulas, (2008, Part - II) any region of any arbitrary areaextent is assumed as being a potential seismogenic region. Consequently, thecapability for the generation of a maximum magnitude future EQ at each virtualseismogenic region is investigated all over Greece at certain times. The laterresults are used to compile maps of the seismic potential / maximum expected EQmagnitude for Greece at 5 year's intervals ranging from 1970 to 2000. Thecomparison of these seismic potential maps / maximum expected EQ magnitude tothe corresponding seismicity (M>6R) for each corresponding 5 years periodreveals their tight interrelation. Therefore, the calculated seismic potential/ maximum expected EQ magnitude, due to its drastic change in time in anyseismogenic region, is a dynamic in time parameter which indicates the seismicenergy charge status of each seismogenic area.

The seismogenic area in the lithosphere considered as an "Open Physical  System". Its implications on some seismological aspects. Part - III. Seismic  Potential