English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We show that paradoxical consequences of violations of Bell's inequality areinduced by the use of an unsuitable probabilistic description for theEPR-Bohm-Bell experiment. The conventional description (due to Bell) is basedon a combination of statistical data collected for different settings ofpolarization beam splitters (PBSs). In fact, such data consists of someconditional probabilities which only partially define a probability space.Ignoring this conditioning leads to apparent contradictions in the classicalprobabilistic model (due to Kolmogorov). We show how to make a completelyconsistent probabilistic model by taking into account the probabilities ofselecting the settings of the PBSs. Our model matches both the experimentaldata and is consistent with classical probability theory.

Complete account of randomness in the EPR-Bohm-Bell experiment