English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Requirements about the quality of clinical guidelines can be represented byschemata borrowed from the theory of abductive diagnosis, using temporal logicto model the time-oriented aspects expressed in a guideline. Previously, wehave shown that these requirements can be verified using interactive theoremproving techniques. In this paper, we investigate how this approach can bemapped to the facilities of a resolution-based theorem prover, Otter, and acomplementary program that searches for finite models of first-orderstatements, Mace. It is shown that the reasoning required for checking thequality of a guideline can be mapped to such fully automated theorem-provingfacilities. The medical quality of an actual guideline concerning diabetesmellitus 2 is investigated in this way.

Checking the Quality of Clinical Guidelines using Automated Reasoning Tools