English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We correct a mistake in the analytical expression for the energy densitygiven in Phys. Rev. C76, 021902 (2007) [arXiv:0704.3625 [hep-ph]]. Theexpression should be multiplied by 16. One question then arises; how could itbe possible to explain this difference between the analytical and numericalresults in the same model if both are correct? We find a subtle problem in thetreatment of the randomness of the color source along the longitudinaldirection and the treatment of the longitudinal extent of the color source.

Erratum: Initial fields and instability in the classical model of the heavy-ion collision