English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In their comment, Murphy et al. (arxiv:0708.3677) criticize the fittingprocedure we used in two previous papers [Srianand et al. 2004(Paper I) andChand et al. 2004 (Paper II)] and conclude that the above papers offers nostringent test to previous evidence for varying fine structure constant. Wethink this is a hasty conclusion as (a) our procedure is robust as shown inPaper II; (b) the data used by Murphy et al., in particular the error array,are different from ours and there are differences in the fitting procedure; (c)despite these differences, 70 per cent of their individual measurements areconsistent with that quoted in Paper II. Our reanalysis using VPFIT withidentical initial guess parameters leads to \Delta\alpha/\alpha =(0.01+/-0.15)x 10^{-5}$ for 21 systems (excluding two systems that deviate atmore than 3$\sigma$ level) with very little scatter (\chi^2_\nu ~1).

In response to the comments by Murphy et al. (arxiv:0708.3677)