English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The comments raised in Ref. [1] by Mishra et al aim at two papers containedin Ref. [2]. We show that those comments on Ref. [2] pointed out by Mishra etal in Ref.[1] are not relevant and the concept used in Ref.[2] is consistentand in compliance with the classical approximation of the transportcoefficients [3]. We would also like to note that most of the comments in Ref.[1] were meant for light quarks, but are not even appropriate for heavy quarks.

Reply to Comment on the paper ``Energy Loss of Charm Quarks in the Quark-Gluon Plasma: Collisional vs Radiative'' by Mishra et al