English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Lieberman and Melott built their recent arXiv preprint 0704.2896 on mypublished paper and (a preprint of) a subsequent comment by Liebermansassociate Cornette. But had this group waited for the Cornette comment toactually appear in print together with the expected Reply, they would havelearned that his comment exposes Cornettes confusion that likely was due tojournal misprint of my figure. Thus 0704.2896 is baseless. Despite receivingthe extended Reply with Errata, these authors still fail to recognize thatdetrending of paleontological records-which they erroneously promote as amust-is an arbitrary rather than a universal operation.

Note on: Considering the Case for Biodiversity Cycles: Reexamining the  Evidence for Periodicity in the Fossil Record, by Lieberman and Melott, arXiv  preprint 0704.2896