English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We point out the evident errors in statistical analysis of the data,performed by Klapdor-Kleingrothaus et al in recently published paper toestablish a limit on the stability of electron with respect to the decay into$\nu+\gamma$. We performed the reestimation of the sensitivity of theexperimental setups to the 256 keV gamma emitted in the hypothetical electrondecay, and show that in [1] the limits on the electron stability and chargenonconservation parameter $\epsilon_{e\nu\gamma}^{2}$ are overestimated by atleast a factor of 5. We have revealed evident errors in the statisticalanalysis, performed by Klapdor-Kleingrothaus et al in a recently publishedpaper [1] to establish a limit on the stability of electron with respect to thedecay into $\nu+\gamma$. The performed reestimation of the sensitivity of theexperimental setups to the 256 keV gamma emitted in the hypothetical electrondecay, has shown that the limits on the electron stability and chargenonconservation parameter $\epsilon_{e\nu\gamma}^{2}$ presented in [1], havebeen overestimated by at least a factor of 5.

Comment on the statistical analysis in "A new experimental limit for the  stability of the electron" by H.V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, I.V. Krivosheina  and I.V. Titkova