z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative Evaluation of Open Flap Debridement Therapy with Two Different Types of Platelet Concentrates, T-PRF and L-PRF as Adjuncts- A Systematic Review
Author(s) -
Gowri Pendyala,
Ekta Pankaj Kumar Srivastava,
Babita Pawar,
Satish Manthena,
Swati Pustake,
Saurabh Joshi,
A. Mani,
Vidyasagar Mopagar
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of pharmaceutical research international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2456-9119
DOI - 10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i54b33785
Subject(s) - platelet rich fibrin , medicine , debridement (dental) , fibrin , cochrane library , dentistry , gold standard (test) , surgery , randomized controlled trial , radiology , immunology
Conventional Periodontal therapy such as scaling and root planing and open flap debridement aims to halt the inflammation process and promotes repair of disease-related defects. Current regenerative procedures offers a limited potential toward attaining a complete periodontal restoration and none is considered a gold standard in the treatment of intrabony defects. This study was done to compare the efficiency of Titanium-Platelet Rich Fibrin and Leukocyte-Platelet Rich Fibrin as adjuncts to Open Flap Debridement  therapy to treat intra-bony periodontal defects. A search was conducted through PubMed and various other databases such as Cochrane, Google Scholar and EBSCO Host , under the key words, OFD , T-PRF,L-PRF, Clinical Outcomes, Comparison and  Randomised Contolled Trials. Six relevant articles were selected for analysis. Compared to non-platelet concentrates, L-PRFproves to be the better adjunct to open flap debridement therapy. When compared to T-PRF, however, L-PRF has comparatively inferior properties of bone defect resolution and fill.We can conclude that T-PRF has better properties, greater bone defect fill and defect resolution as compared to L-PRF.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here