z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Appropriate kidney stone size for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: When to switch to a percutaneous approach
Author(s) -
Ryoji Takazawa
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
world journal of nephrology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2220-6124
DOI - 10.5527/wjn.v4.i1.111
Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous nephrolithotomy , kidney stones , ureteroscopy , percutaneous , upper urinary tract , surgery , urinary system , first line treatment , urology , ureter , chemotherapy
Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) has become a more effective and safer treatment for whole upper urinary tract stones. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is currently the first-line recommended treatment for large kidney stones ≥ 20 mm and it has an excellent stone-free rate for large kidney stones. However, its invasiveness is not negligible considering its major complication rates. Staged fURS is a practical treatment for such large kidney stones because fURS has a minimal blood transfusion risk, short hospitalization and few restrictions on daily routines. However, as the stone size becomes larger, the stone-free rate decreases, and the number of operations required increases. Therefore, in our opinion, staged fURS is a practical option for kidney stones 20 to 40 mm. Miniaturized PNL combined with fURS should be considered to be a preferred option for stones larger than 40 mm. Moreover, URS is an effective treatment for multiple upper urinary tract stones. Especially for patients with a stone burden < 20 mm, URS is a favorable option that promises a high stone-free rate after a single session either unilaterally or bilaterally. However, for patients with a stone burden ≥ 20 mm, a staged operation should be considered to achieve stone-free status.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here